Drilling off the coast of California, Florida and elsewhere would
increase domestic oil production by 7 percent by 2030, according to the
Energy Information Administration.
But “because oil prices are determined on the international market…any
impact on average wellhead prices is expected to be insignificant.”
There is no short-term benefit to drilling, says the EIA, because it
would take at least five years for oil production to begin. (Source: Center for American Progress.)
On the other hand, Congress and George Bush could take a step
tomorrow that would create a drop in oil prices of between 25 and 50
percent overnight.
Republicans have shifted blame for high gas prices from
Bush to the Democrats and their opposition to offshore drilling, and
all it cost them was the credibility of Florida Gov. Charlie Crist
This is according to testimony before a Senate Committee two weeks ago
by Michael Greenberger, the former director of Trading & Markets
for the Commodities Future Trading Commission (CFTC), the government board that oversees commodities markets:
“Yes, overnight [closing the Enron Loophole] will bring down the
price of crude oil to get at least a 25 percent drop in the cost of oil
and a corresponding drop in the cost of gasoline. Some people estimate
50 percent.”
Greenberger’s testimony was brought to light by an investigation
into the Enron Loophole by Keith Olbermann on MSNBC’s “Countdown” last
week. (A transcript of Olbermann’s report follows.)
While it was a technical success, Enron On-Line was based on a
flawed business model that drained corporate revenues — even while the
company was manipulating the rates consumers paid for electricity in
California. Enron On-Line eventually drove the company into bankruptcy,
and the cooking of the books to hide its losses led to charges of
conspiracy and fraud against Enron executives.
OLBERMANN: John McCain is renowned for saying he does
not know much about the economy and for parading around those advisers
of his who he says do know something about the economy. our third story
tonight, A COUNTDOWN special report on the price of gas, and how
McCain‘s chief economic adviser, among others, helped create and defend
pivotal legislation that unleashed speculators to run up gas prices. It
is, in essence, a legalized form of insider trading, deregulation that
lets speculators overwhelm trading in oil futures, those complicated
contracts that let commercial users of oil hedger their bets about
future price and supply fluctuations by agreeing to prices and delivery
dates ahead of time.
Since this legislation passed, gasoline prices have more than
doubled and commodity traders have made tens of millions of dollars,
devastating thousands of small companies that deal in oil, and creating
the risk of a speculative bubble popping.
How does McCain fit in? The road connecting him to four dollar gas begins with Enron.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
OLBERMANN (voice-over): Soon after Enron‘s birth as a power supplier
in the 1980s, CEO Ken Lay decided he could make more money betting on
electricity futures, especially if government regulators didn‘t stop
him from cornering the market and gaming the system. Under the first
President Bush, an obscure agency called the Commodities Future Trading
Commission obliged Ken Lay. The CFTC chairwoman, Wendy Gramm, left
Enron alone.
When Bill Clinton beat Bush, it took only one week before Enron
asked Gramm to lock in her hands-off position as official CFTC policy.
Gramm started the process. The CFTC approved it after she left on
Clinton‘s inauguration day. Five weeks later, she took a part-time post
on Enron‘s board of directors and wound up earning more than 900,000
dollars over the next decade. Clinton never undid Gramm‘s changes.
Fast forward to the year 2000 and Bush v. Gore. In the chaos of
constitutional crisis, Enron got a law passed containing what is now
known as the Enron loophole. Where Gramm deregulated individual trades,
the Enron loophole deregulated entire markets, online markets. Enron
had just started its own online market, and set its sites on the state
of California.
Over the next six months, California suffered 38 rolling blackouts,
as Enron used artificial shortages, bogus deals and total knowledge of
the market as sole owner of its own online market to triple
California‘s energy bills. In the dark, regulators had less power than
California did, leaving Enron laughing about it.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The money you stole from those poor grandmothers in California.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yes, Grandma Millie, man.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yes, now she wants her (EXPLETIVE DELETED) money
back for all the power you charged—jammed up her (EXPLETIVE DELETED) at
250 dollars a megawatt hour.
OLBERMANN: The Enron loophole applied to all energy commodities,
oil, propane, natural gas. So, today, oil futures are driven by
speculators, free from any regulatory oversight. Now, you can‘t just
blame OPEC any more. British Petroleum paid 303 million dollars to
settle charges it cornered the propane market in 2004, inflating
heating costs for seven million American homes.
Two years ago, a Republican Senate report recognized what
speculators have done and blamed the Enron loophole. Two weeks ago, the
Senate Commerce Committee heard testimony about the Enron loophole‘s
effect on the price of a barrel of oil.
MICHAEL GREENBERGER, FMR. CFTC DIR OF TRADING & MARKETS: The
speculators are not just placing bets in these futures markets, they‘re
saying, gosh, if I can control the price of heating oil, I‘ll go out
and buy heating oil. So you have Morgan Stanley as the biggest heating
oil owner in New England.
SEN AMY KLOBUCHAR (D), MINNESOTA: The idea is to put the words
energy back in so that we can actually go back to where we were before
this, what Dr. Cooper calls the foolish but affectionately called Enron
loophole.
GREENBERGER: Yes, overnight that will bring down the price of crude
oil to get at least a 25 percent drop in the cost of oil and a
corresponding drop in the cost of gasoline. Some people estimate 50
percent.
MARK COOPER, CONSUMER FEDERATION OF AMERICA: The speculative bubble
in petroleum markets has cost the average American household about
1,500 dollars in increased gasoline, natural gas and electricity
expenditures in the two years since the Senate committee on
investigations first called attention to the problem. The Senate knew
about this problem two years ago.
OLBERMANN: John McCain seemed to understand this problem even
earlier. In 2002 and 2003, he voted with the minorities to close the
Enron loophole. “We‘re all tainted by Enron‘s money,” he said. “Enron
made a sound investment in Washington. It did them a lot of good. Where
they really do well is around the edges, the insertion of an amendment,
the Enron loophole, into an appropriations bill.”
But for most of this campaign, McCain has offered explanations other
than the influence of speculators and remedies other than regulation.
MCCAIN: We can develop alternate energy sources.
OLBERMANN: Will alternative energy fix things without closing the Enron loophole?
GREENBERGER: What‘s going to happen when you get all this new, clean
energy is the banks are going to go into those markets and rob those
guys blind, like they‘re robbing the gas station owners and heating oil
dealers in this country right now.
OLBERMANN: What about McCain‘s idea to stop filling America‘s strategic reserve?
GEORGE SOROS, CHAIRMAN, SOROS FUND MANAGEMENT: The institutions
acting as a herd are accumulating much larger—setting aside much larger
reserves than the strategic reserve is. It‘s a multiple.
OLBERMANN: John McCain doesn‘t talk about the Enron loophole any
more. One McCain adviser reportedly said he no longer even has a
position on it. When the bipartisan Farm Bill shut the Enron loophole
last month, John McCain opposed the Farm Bill, citing its spending
levels.
What changed? Since 2006, John McCain‘s top economic adviser has
been former Texas Senator Phil Gramm, husband of the former CFTC head
who then joined Enron. McCain chaired Gramm‘s 1996 presidential race,
with Ken Lay as regional chairman. It was Gramm who passed the Enron
loophole, partially written by Enron itself, with no hearings, with no
debate.
It was Gramm who stopped Democrats from closing the Enron loophole,
and it was Gramm who became vice chairman at the Swiss financial firm
UBS in 2002, less than a year after UBS bought the shattered remains of
Enron‘s energy trading arm.
Federal lobbying forms reviewed by COUNTDOWN show that Gramm lobbied
Congress about commodity trading rules in 2006 and that his company,
specifically, his former aide John Sabercool (ph), now a UBS lobbyist,
lobbied the Senate as recently as last year against the close the Enron
loophole act, without actually calling it that.
McCain‘s finance co-chair, Wayne Berman, lobbied just last year for
Chevron and for the American Petroleum Institute against the Price
Gouging Prevention Act. And this year the lobbying firm for which
Berman serves as managing director was hired by the New York Mercantile
Exchange to lobby against the Close the Enron Loophole Act.
In fact, McCain‘s top campaign adviser, controversial lobbyist
Charlie Black, was paid 140,000 dollars by JP Morgan back in 2000 for
the sole purpose of lobbying Congress to pass the Commodities Future
Modernization Act, the same act that contained the Enron loophole.
McCain skipped this month‘s hearing on gas prices, but this week
after committee member Maria Cantwell pushed the Bush administration to
investigate, McCain finally changed his tune in public.
MCCAIN: We must reform the laws and regulations governing the oil futures market.
OLBERMANN: Senator John McCain, however, still has not mentioned the
Enron loophole, still has Gramm and Berman and Black heading his
campaign, writing his economic policy. When Senator Cantwell sent a
letter asking the CFTC cut off a new loophole that allows U.S.
speculators to channel trades unregulated through London and Dubai,
John McCain declined to sign it.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
OLBERMANN: Senator Obama as well has an adviser who has lobbied for
the American Petroleum Institute. Obama reportedly opposed the Enron
loophole and voted for that farm bill that contained a closure of it.
In an e-mail today, the McCain committee did not address our reporting
on his advisers, but pointed instead to his 2003 vote against the Enron
loophole and said, quote, “Senator McCain‘s opposition to the Farm Bill
had absolutely nothing to do with this issue, but rather the billions
in pork barrel projects and subsidies in the bill that are sure to do
more harm than good for most farmer, consumers and taxpayers.”