Quadsville

Loading...
Cancer treatment found that cures 100% of every cancer in mice to be tested in humans.
Posted by: renko on July 5, 2008 at 7:10AM EST

Granulocytes go to work on removing human cancerous cells.

'All the mice we treated were 100 per cent cured' lead researcher Dr. Zheng Cui told CTV News. 'So that was very surprising for us.'

Scientists to test if cancer cure can work in humans

American researchers will soon start a human trial to determine whether a treatment that can eradicate cancer in mice will do the same in people.

The treatment will transfuse specific white blood cells, called granulocytes, into patients with advanced forms of cancer. The granulocytes will come from healthy young people with immune systems that produce cells that have high levels of anti-cancer activity.

In the animal studies, white blood cells from cancer-resistant mice cured all lab mice who had malignant tumours. The cells have also been able to kill cervical, prostate and breast cancer tumour cells in Petri dish tests.

"All the mice we treated were 100 per cent cured," lead researcher Dr. Zheng Cui told CTV News. "So that was very surprising for us."

Cui, an associate professor of pathology at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center in North Carolina, will announce the study Saturday at the Understanding Aging conference in Los Angeles.

Granulocytes account for about 60 per cent of all white blood cells in the human body. The scientists already know, via a small study of human volunteers, that granulocytes from people under the age of 50 are most effective at killing cancer cells.

The study will begin with 22 cancer patients for whom conventional treatment has been unsuccessful. The researchers say that they will know within three months if the treatment will work in humans.

Cancer researchers worldwide will be watching the tests closely.

"Certainly in the mouse, being able to do these things is quite remarkable and very exciting," said Dr. Ronan Foley of the Juravinski Cancer Centre in Hamilton, Ont. "Oftentimes when it is translated into the human situation it doesn't work as well. But that doesn't mean it isn't going to work."

 

Send This | Categories:
(6) Comments
Posted by: Anne-Marie Hislop on July 5, 2008 8:14AM EST
Interesting - we'll see.

Posted by: Michael Burt on July 5, 2008 9:10AM EST
Please don't raise false hopes in desperate people. They won't know anything in 3 months, the Dr is a fool if he really said that in context. It is many years from a petri dish to an approved drug for humans, if ever. Sure a cure for any cancer would be great, but getting people's hopes too high about something years away is cruel. You can't grab onto a story, no matter how hopeful, out of cyberspace & present it as whole cloth. That is highly unfair to those afflicted, who seek hope around every corner. Knowing cures are being sought should be enough, until some definitive results are obtained. Petri dishes & mice are not definitive results in the scientific/medical community.

Posted by: renko on July 5, 2008 9:23AM EST
You've got to know that wasn't the intent: the point was to highlight this latest possible breakthrough.

"The study will begin with 22 cancer patients for whom conventional treatment has been unsuccessful."
-That really says it all; there is, at least, something that can be tried for folks w/out current hope.

Posted by: Michael Burt on July 5, 2008 10:24AM EST
I didn't mean to intimate that purposeful misleading was your intent. But many grab at straws, & the pain of later disillusionment outweighs the temporary gain in optimism, trust me. Also, don't assume the "22" are "without hope" just because "conventional" treatments have failed. Most honest medical professionals will be the first to admit they don't have have all the answers, nor access to all the "cures". I'm just, from experience, counseling cautious optimism, & the story you quoted doesn't have the dose of salts I usually deem necessary. But that's my opinion, based on experience though it is. I know not all in my position see things the same. Each deals independently, but most like to stay grounded too.

Posted by: face on July 5, 2008 4:55PM EST
The best news I've heard yet! Hope you keep us up-to-date with the results!

Posted by: Michael Burt on July 7, 2008 2:03PM EST
Decided to do little reading on my own. Please don't take this the wrong way, I hope it is a rousing success. But following are a few facts I read @ scientificblogging.com, the entire URL was very long-
1)The mice trials took 10 years. Almost certainly human trials will take as long, at least in America.
2)500 potential donors tested to get 100 actual, donors must be healthy & under 50 yrs old.
3)It will take approximately 3 donors for every cancer patient treated.
4)Initial cost is $100,000 per patient. Of course that will lower, but with inflation who knows? My MS treatments years ago were $14,000 annually, a major reason I stopped them. I do not believe in milking insurance dry.
Once again, I truly hope this is the magic bullet so long sought. I'm just trying to inject a bit of moderation. To the researchers & cancer victims, the very best of luck.

Loading...
About This Blog

Rate this Blog:
0 rating(s)

Latest Entries
Loading...
Links
Loading...
Report Photos

© 2008, The Quad-City Times, Davenport, IA | Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Powered by