Posted by: renko at 10:28PM EST on August 23, 2008
Newsweek reports that in a conversation “secretly tape-recorded by the FBI on June 25, 2006,” Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) “discussed ways to get a pipeline bill
through the Alaska Legislature with Bill Allen, an oil-services
executive accused of providing the senator with about $250,000 in
undisclosed financial benefits.” Stevens promised Allen, “I’m gonna try
to see if I can get some bigwigs
from back here and say, ‘Look … you gotta get this done’.” Two days
later, Vice President Cheney undertook the unusual move of writing a
letter to the Alaska Legislature urging members to “promptly enact” a bill to build the pipeline.
Monday 9/1:
Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn. (Quisling)
Vice President Dick Cheney (War criminal, eats babies, shoots friends just to watch them die)
Monday primetime (10-11pm Eastern Time)
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, R-Calif. (Groper)
President Bush and First Lady Laura Bush (Drunk/enabler or enabler/drunk. Choose one. Or both.)
Tuesday 9/2:
Fmr. Gov. Tom Ridge, R-Pa. (Boring. Will bring color flip charts to liven things up)
Former CA Secretary of State Rosario Marin (Ethnic ...I'm from California, never heard of her)
Fmr. Sen. Fred Thompson, R-Tenn. (Geezer - to speak during early-bird GOP dinner. Menu: creamed corn and... more creamed corn)
Gov. Linda Lingle, R-Hawaii (Exotic Ethnic)
Fmr. Lt. Gov. Michael Steele, R-Md. (Really Ethnic)
Tuesday primetime (10-11pm Eastern Time)
Gov. Sarah Palin, R-Alaska (MILF)
Fmr. Gov. Mike Huckabee, R-Ark. (Godsmacked Yokel)
Fmr. Mayor Rudy Giuliani, R-New York City ***KEYNOTER*** (911!911!911!911!911!)
Wednesday 9/3:
Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn.(Sent wife to California to be an "actress" so he could stay home and boink other women)
Meg Whitman, Ebay CEO (Beanie baby entrepreneur enabler)
Carly Fiorina, former HP CEO (HP EPIC FAIL)
Fmr. Gov. Mitt Romney, R-Mass. (Magic Underwear Cultist)
Wednesday primetime (10-11pm Eastern Time)
Cindy McCain (Tweaker. Probably the person who stole your car stereo in the early nineties)
Vice Presidential nominee (TBA. If they keep 91 year-old John McCain in the wings too long, could be the default nominee)
Gov. Bobby Jindal, R-La., will speak after the VP nominee (Ethnic/exorcist/nine years old)
Thursday 9/4:
Gov. Tim Pawlenty, R-Minn. (Really really non-ethnic. Makes Casper the Friendly Ghost look like Seal)
Gov. Charlie Crist, R-Fla. (Gay)
Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kansas (Crazy. Dyes his hair, so... gay)
Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla (Not Mexican but still muy Ethnic)
Thursday primetime (10-11pm Eastern Time)
Sen. John McCain (video before his speech) - (If he is still awake. Otherwise run The Deerhunter as true life biographical film as he remembers itfrom when he was A PRISONER OF WAR)
After party until 11:18 unless candidate falls asleep.
Even though mccain clinched the republican primary on March 4, had an incredibly low amount of votes in the primaries, both before and (here is the kicker) AFTER he already clinched. (for example, he only
won one of the twelve caucuses, topped 55% of the primary vote only
once (DC) before clinching the nomination and even after clinching the
nomination only broke 80% of the vote two times in 10 primary contests.) Hardly a vote of confidence from his own party – a party that is as
unpopular as any political party has been in my lifetime.
Mccain has angered an entire hugely-motivated section of the
republican party – the fundies, (only to finally flirt with an extremist
pastor (Hagee) and then be forced to denounce him after pressure to do so, therefore alienating this portion of the base further.)
Mccain has broken his own campaign finance laws
- benefiting from them in the primaries when he had no support or
money (yet denying that he ever “really” opted into the public
financing.) Some “straight talk: there.
(As well as mccain's leaving his first wife when she was disfigured in a horrific accident
(after she waited for him for years to return from Vietnam).
Mccain himself has deep ties to Ahmed Chalabi, who is a known double-agent for Iran (and still continues to be linked to
Iran, even after hooking the bush administration up w/ the original false wmd-intel and officials to sell the iraq-war). Chalabi still has mccain’s full support – which is either dangerously incompetent and startlingly naïve....or it is way more sinister
than just being naive.
It is long past time for people to start looking at the many
major overriding issues with McCain and his campaign, (which would be fatal for a Democrat). These should be spread far and wide.
In 2000, the nation elected bush without taking a close look at his background, behaviors, or past decisions and actions. Despite being covered up by the gop conress and WH, as the incompetence and consequences of that action became ever more clear, people fled their decision in droves. Today, there are very few who can claim that they, or the country, are better off than they were 4, much less 8 years ago. Hopefully, the American electorate will consider their options more carefully, this time.
I am sick and tired of the president of the United
States embarrassing me. The world we live in is too complex to entrust
it to someone else whose idea of intellectual curiosity and grasp of
foreign policy issues is to tell us he can look into Vladimir Putin's
eyes and see into his soul.
George Bush's record as a student, military man, businessman and leader
of the free world is one of constant failure. And the part that
troubles me most is he seems content with himself.
He will leave office with the country $10 trillion in debt, fighting
two wars, our international reputation in shambles, our government
cloaked in secrecy and suspicion that his entire presidency has been a
litany of broken laws and promises, our citizens' faith in our own
country ripped to shreds. Yet Bush goes bumbling along, grinning and
spewing moronic one-liners, as though nobody understands what a
colossal failure he has been.
I fear to the depth of my being that John McCain is just like him.
John McCain is unelectable. The American public just doesn’t fully know it yet.
--"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity"
bushpromise
to Georgia....Pentagon officials told McClatchy that they were
increasingly dubious that any U.S. Navy vessels would join the aid
operation, in large part because the U.S.-based hospital ships likely
to go, the USNS Comfort and the USNS Mercy, would take weeks to arrive.
“The
president was writing checks to the Georgians without knowing what he
had in the bank,” said a senior administration official.
“The
president got out in front of the planning when he talked publicly
about using naval forces,” said a second senior administration
official. “At that point we need to look at treaty obligations, our
bilateral relations with the Turks and others, waterway restrictions
and what kind of ships might be appropriate and usable
Posted by: renko at 10:43AM EST on August 16, 2008
Squeezed by medical costs: In 2007, only 34% of
families had enough money to cover the cost of a medical emergency,
down from 43.7% in 2000. The share of private sector workers with
employer-sponsored health insurance dropped from 64% in 2000 to 60% in 2006, while the costs associated with medical care increased 35% from March 2001 to July 2008.
_______________
On top of McCain’s overall policy of steep tax cuts for high-income Americans, he’s also proposing a very
significant tax increase on the broad group of people who receive
health insurance through their employers.
Presently, your wages are
subject to income tax, but your health-benefits are not.
McCain wants to change this and start subjecting your health-care benefits to taxation.
Basically, McCain wants to quit giving your employer the tax break allowed for providing you health-insurance. (Which will cause them to quit providing you health insurance).
Instead, he wants everyone to buy their own insurance and provide "tax credits" for doing so. $2500/yr for a single. $5000/yr for a family.
(Since the annual Cobra costs for (a healthy) single-person policy runs about $6000/yr....I don't think this is much of a "solution.")
McCain's economic advisor Doug Holtz-Eakin, disputes the characterization
of McCain's policy as a tax increase, arguing instead that it"
“is a
transformation of the tradition of a tax subsidy to private insurance
to make sure that subsidy is fair, both in the sense that it is
available to every American regardless of the source of their private
insurance and that every person gets the same amount — $5,000 for a
family, $2,500 for an individual.”
James Kvaal counters
that McCain’s plan “would tax workers’ health benefits, which are
largely tax-free today,” thus increasing the amount of tax people need
to pay, which is a tax increase in any common sense understanding of
the term. More important, though, is the fact that the new somewhat
counterbalancing subsidy McCain is proposing won’t make up the
difference over the long run:
Actually, considered as a whole, McCain’s plan will raise taxes on
millions of workers for two reasons. First, his plan would tax workers’
health benefits, which are largely tax-free today. Although he also
creates a new tax credit for insurance premiums, many workers will pay
more in taxes on their insurance then they get from the new credit.
Second, the value of McCain’s credit will erode quickly. While
health care premiums are expected to grow by 7 percent a year, McCain’s
credit will increase by only about 2 percent a year. In contrast,
current tax benefits keep up with rising premiums.
Should the oh-so-successful deregulated approach to wallstreet/banking/mortgages/credit-card co's be applied to your health-care?
What say you?
Something to keep in mind:
"....nearly 90 percent of people
seeking coverage in the individual market “never end up buying a plan,
finding it either very difficult or impossible to find one that met
their needs or is affordable.” From a recent Commonwealth study:
In “most states, individuals with preexisting conditions are denied coverage, have conditions excluded,
or face much higher and often unaffordable premiums.” Insurance
companies will disqualify patients from coverage for undergoing caesarean sections, or “for just taking certain medicines because of the possibility of future costs, including common drugs as Lipitor, Zocor, Nexium, and Advairpre.
Altogether, McCain’s tax plan would give $175 billion per year in
tax breaks to corporations, including $45 billion a year to the top 200 corporations alone.
The following table shows the tax savings to America’s five largest
firms. See a full list of all 200 companies and their savings under
McCain here:
These giveaways are just one part of McCain’s doubling of the Bush tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy which would create the largest deficits in 25 years and drive the United States into the deepest deficits since World War II.
A recent analysis by the Public Campaign Action Fund found that John McCain’s campaign has received $5.6 million from the PACs and executives of the Fortune 500 list.
Drug companies are quietly pushing through
price hikes of 100% — or even more than 1,000% — for a very small but
growing number of prescription drugs, helping to drive up costs for
insurers, patients and government programs.
The number of brand-name drugs with increases of
100% or more could double this year from four years ago, researchers
from the University of Minnesota say. Many of the drugs are older
products that treat fairly rare, but often serious or even
life-threatening, conditions.
(examples: Questcor Pharmaceuticals
last August raised the wholesale price on Acthar, which treats spasms
in babies, from about $1,650 a vial to more than $23,000.
Ovation
raised the cost of Cosmegen, which treats a type of tumor, from $16.79
to $593.75 in January 2006.)
The average wholesale price of 26 brand-name
drugs jumped 100% or more in a single cost adjustment last year, up
from 15 in 2004, the university study found. In the first half of this
year, 17 drugs made the list.
--Pretty steep hikes on drugs for which all the research and
(presumably) all the advertising and doctor-buying has been done.
"It is not a "free market" when producers
can arbitrarily push through price increases at will for products
people need to survive, and nothing can be done to stop them. Where is
the pressure to lower prices?
By some bizarre logic, we are
expected to accept the "workings of capitalism" when companies raise
prices by 100 percent, and we are supposed to object to our government
acting to bring prices down by increasing competition. "
--We
are expected to accept those workings because PHARMA has a huge
majority of Congress on the payroll. It's pretty hard to start
containing health care costs for Medicare and Medicaid when the very
people who are supposed to be grappling with the issue are receiving
huge campaign donations from the source of the problem.
When it
comes time for any real reform on health care (and I hope that time
arrives shortly after January 20, 2009), BIG PHARMA and all of its members
and cohorts should be the first targets.
The John McCain Health Plan
If it wasn't such a serious problem, this would be more hilarious. McCain's plan for the crisis in rural health care: send in celebrity athletes to inspire kids to lose weight and adopt a healthy lifestyle.
Now, there's nothing wrong with having Shaq inspire kids to be
healthy, but what rural residents need right now is more health care
providers. That doesn't seem to be mentioned in McCain's overall
strategy. Indeed, it doesn't seem that McCain has much of a strategy at
all outside of letting Shaq handle it.
Two days ago, a gunman walked into the offices of the Democratic Party
in Little Rock, Arkansas, and shot the state's chairman to death. The motives are still unclear,
but it is starting increasingly to look like yet another case in which
an unhinged wingnut decided to "take out" more liberals.
Two weeks ago, another gunman walked into a liberal Unitarian
Universalist church in Knoxville, Tennessee, and began shooting,
killing one man and wounding several others before he was tackled. He
had written a manifesto before the rampage indicating his belief that "all liberals should be killed." At his home, investigators found books attacking liberals by the likes of Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, and ... Bill O'Reilly.
These issues have, of course, never been discussed on Bill
O'Reilly's Fox News program. O'Reilly has never even mentioned the fact
that the Knoxville shooter read his books and evidently watched his
show. Indeed, his show not only constantly demonizes liberals, O'Reilly
frequently does so by accusing liberals of being the source of vicious
hatemongering -- as he did Wednesday, in the segment above, in which he
informs us that "the real haters in America are on the far left"
Just par for the course, for rightwing pundits. This "Eliminationist" rhetoric can be broken down into 5 parts.
Part 1: Expressing a desire or a demand for extermination, removal, or infliction of harm
Rush Limbaugh:
"I tell people don’t kill all the liberals. Leave enough so we can have
two on every campus -- living fossils -- so we will never forget what
these people stood for."
Ann Coulter: "I think our motto should be, post-9-11: 'Rag*ead talks tough, rag*ead faces consequences.'"
Ann Coulter: "We need somebody to put rat poisoning in Justice Stevens' creme brulee. ... That's just a joke, for you in the media."
"This
free speech thing is a canard. ... How about not letting traitors teach
at universities? Yes, I realize I've just proposed firing the entire
Harvard faculty. These institutions can be shaken -- look at Dan
Rather. He's out. Or, as I look at it, one down, two to go. We're going
to need a much bigger trophy case for all these stuffed heads."
"Some
liberals have become even too crazy for Texas to execute, which is a
damn shame. They're always saying -- we're oppressed, we're oppressed
so let's do it. Let's oppress them."
[Quoting
from an AP report] "Aljazeera has broadcasted an insurgent video today,
shows four peace activists taken hostage in Iraq, with a previously
unknown group claiming responsibility for the kidnappings. The unknown
group is the Swords of Righteousness Brigade, and they said the four
were spies working undercover as Christian peace activists, according
to Aljazeera. Aljazeera said that it could not verify any of the
information on the tape. The aid group Christian Peacemaker Teams has
confirmed that four of its members were taken hostage on Saturday...."
[P]art
of me that likes this. And some of you might say, "Rush, that's
horrible. Peace activists taken hostage." Well, here's why I like it. I
like any time a bunch of leftist feel-good hand-wringers are shown
reality. So here we have these peace activists over there. I don't care
if they're Christian or not.
[...]
Yeah, as warped as
these people are, you know they're going to blame Bush for this... They
wouldn't have been kidnapped because they wouldn't have been there in
the first place if Bush hadn't gone and caused the war and created all
these terrorists. I mean, these people are liberals, they're warped.
Well, I mean, that's why there's -- I'm telling you, folks, there's a
part of me that likes this. Probably, even with this, though, you know,
they're not going to see the light of day. They're not going to -- I
know, let them take me out of context. I don't care anymore.
Melanie Morgan: "I would have no problem with [New York Times editor Bill Keller] being sent to the gas chamber."
Melanie Morgan: "A great deal of good could be done by arresting Bill Keller having him lined up against the wall and shot."
Lee Rogers:
"[T]he day will come when unpleasant things are going to happen to a
bunch of stupid liberals and it's going to be very amusing to watch."
Let's
start with the following New York Times reporters and editors: Arthur
"Pinch" Sulzberger Jr. , Bill Keller, Eric Lichtblau, and James Risen.
Do you have an idea where they live?
Go hunt them down and do
America a favor. Get their photo, street address, where their kids go
to school, anything you can dig up, and send it to the link above. This
is your chance to be famous -- grab for the golden ring.
I
repeat: Should the entire American Left fall over dead tomorrow, I
would rejoice, and order pizza to celebrate. They are not my
countrymen; they are animals who happen to walk upright and make noises
that approximate speech. They are below human. I look forward to seeing
each and every one in Hell.
Hey,
you know, if you want to ban military recruiting, fine, but I'm not
going to give you another nickel of federal money. You know, if I'm the
president of the United States, I walk right into Union Square, I set
up my little presidential podium, and I say, "Listen, citizens of San
Francisco, if you vote against military recruiting, you're not going to
get another nickel in federal funds. Fine. You want to be your own
country? Go right ahead."
And if Al Qaeda comes in here and
blows you up, we're not going to do anything about it. We're going to
say, look, every other place in America is off limits to you, except
San Francisco. You want to blow up the Coit Tower? Go ahead.
I'll
make a deal with the Left: You wanna impeach President Bush? Go ahead.
Knock yourself out. In fact, let's just go to the polls and turn the
whole government over to the Democrats. You wanna run the whole show?
Fine. Elect Howard Dean President. End all surveillance against
possible enemy combatants, unless you can get a warrant based on
probable cause. Withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan immediately.
Permanently kill the PATRIOT Act. Do whatever you want to do. I'm
perfectly willing, at this point, to do it your way.
I mean,
really, what's the worst that can happen? An American city goes up in
nuclear fire? Well, it’ll probably be New York, Chicago, or LA. You
know, a major city. I don't live there, nor do most Americans. So we'll
be fine.
But here's the other half of the deal: If that happens,
we get to march on Washington, drag you naked and screaming from your
offices, and hang you from the ornate lampposts that line The Mall.
Then, free from roadblocks thrown up by infantile political fools,
maybe we'll get serious about defending the United States, her people,
her freedoms, and her values, in an increasingly hostile world.
I
am absolutely convinced that God is far from finished with the story of
the United States of America. ... First of all, [there's] the matter of
the little battle that must be fought, just as it was in the 19th
century." There were, and are, "two incompatible moral visions for this
country. We had to settle it then. We're going to have to settle it
now. I hope not with blood, not with guns, but we're going to have to
settle it nonetheless. The good news is that I think our side is
finally ready to settle it. Roll up its sleeves, take off its jacket,
and get a little bloody. Spill a little blood. We'll settle it. And
we'll win. And then there's no holding us back.
While
praising the efforts of American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan,
Gibbons accused liberals, movie stars and song makers of "trying to
divide this country."
"I say we tell those liberal,
tree-hugging, Birkenstock-wearing, hippie, tie-dyed liberals to go make
their movies and their music and whine somewhere else," he told the
crowd, according to the Elko Daily Free Press.
He then said it was "too damn bad we didn't buy them a ticket" to become human shields in Iraq.
His
comments came a week after he apologized for calling those who oppose
corporate donations for President Bush's inaugural parties "communists."
"My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go to the New York Times Building."
"We
need to execute people like John Walker in order to physically
intimidate liberals, by making them realize that they can be killed
too."
"They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of
America’s self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant. Fifty years
of treason hasn’t slowed them down."
"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity."
"God
said ... rape the planet -- it's yours. That's our job: drilling,
mining and striping. Sweaters are the anti-Biblical view. Big
gas-guzzling cars with phones and CD players and wet bars -- that's the
Biblical view."
"I have to say I'm all for public flogging."
"I think [women] should be armed but should not [be allowed to] vote."
"Liberals
hate America, they hate flag-wavers, they hate abortion opponents, they
hate all religions except Islam, post 9/11. Even Islamic terrorists
don't hate America like liberals do. They don't have the energy. If
they had that much energy, they'd have indoor plumbing by now."
"My
libertarian friends are probably getting a little upset now but I think
that's because they never appreciate the benefits of local fascism."
"In
this recurring nightmare of a presidency, we have a national debate
about whether he [Clinton] 'did it,' even though all sentient people
know he did. Otherwise there would be debates only about whether to
impeach or assassinate."
Daniel Kish, a senior adviser to Rep. Richard Pombo, R-Calif., in an email:
"Connecticut
should have its statehood taken away from it. The foolishness of its
pampered residents should be demonstrated to others by a government
program to bulldoze the entire state, salt the land and construct a
windfarm to supply NYC with electricity. And its residents should be
relocated to Guantanamo Bay where they can take a number behind the 3
who hung themselves this weekend, since they seem so intent on suicide."
And
Joe Wilson has no right to complain. And I think people like Tim
Russert and the others, who gave this guy such a free ride and all the
media, they're the ones to be shot, not Karl Rove.
Where
does George Soros have all his money? Do you know? Do you know where
George Soros, the big left-wing loon who's financing all these smear
[web]sites, do you know where his money is? Curaçao. Curaçao. They
ought to hang this Soros guy.
Is it any wonder that rightwing, 'conservative,' Republican psychopaths (is that redundant?) are out their killing people/'liberals.'
Their media gurus spout this sort of hate-speech regularly and go unpunished; worse, they are richly rewarded, financially, and defended in the rightwing media echo-chamber.
Imagine there was a website titled ConservativesMustDie.com”.
It would be considered vulgar, crude and threatening.
In fact Homeland
Stupidity might even think it is terroristic. But it is OK for republicans, Malkin, Rushbo, BillO, and so on to continue having and preaching their violent fantasies.
Yet another reason a gop'er should not be elected to the WH: the WH appoints the administrators for the FCC.
---Given that bush's approval ratings are back where they started in 2001 (20+%), isn't it curious that mccain's approval of bush's failed policies ROSE (to 100%).....as he began to campaign for the WH?
Some might even call it pandering...
It's not a given that Republican candidate has the right stuff
"In his frivolous Paris and Britney ad, Sen. John
McCain has asked the right question: Is Barack Obama ready to lead this
country? Pollsters and pundits agree that if
Obama can show the voters that he's up to the job, he'll win. If not,
he won't.
But that begs another question: Is McCain fit to lead America?
That question hasn't been asked, nor has it been answered.
The assumption seems to be that McCain's years of experience in the
military and in Congress of course give him the background and tools
he'd need in the White House.
But is that true? Does McCain have the right stuff?
A careful look at McCain's biography shows that he isn't prepared for
the job. His resume is much thinner than most people think. Here are some reasons why McCain would be a mediocre president:
Lack of accomplishments
Like the current occupant of the White House, McCain got his first
career breaks from the connections and money of his family, not from
hard work. After his release,
McCain knew his weak military record meant he'd never make admiral, so
he turned his sights to a career in politics. With the help of his new
wife's wealth, his new father-in-law's business connections and some
powerful friends had made as a lobbyist for the Navy, he was elected in
1982 to a Congress in a district that he didn't reside in until the day
the seat opened up. A few years later, he succeeded Barry Goldwater as
a senator.....McCain hasn't
accomplished much in the Senate. Even his own campaign doesn't trumpet
his successes, probably because the few victories he's had still rankle
Republicans.....in the primaries, he
campaigned on "I'm not that robotic businessman, I'm not that
sanctimonious hick, I'm not that crazy libertarian, I'm not that
washed-up actor, I'm not that delusional 9/11 guy." In the general
election, he's emphasized that he's not that treasonous dreamer......
No leadership
McCain has frequently taken on near-impossible missions that go against
the grain of his party. It's the basis of his reputation as a maverick.
But McCain has never been able to bring more than a handful of
Republicans along with him on issues such as campaign finance reform or
immigration.....to achieve anything as
president, McCain would have to win over two hostile parties: The
Democrats and the Republicans.
Living in the Sixties
McCain is still fighting the Vietnam War. But he's not fighting the
real historic war, which taught us the folly of injecting ourselves
into a civil war that was none of our business.
McCain is
fighting an imaginary Vietnam War, where a sure victory could have been
achieved with just a little more bombing, just a little more
"pacification," just a little more will to win at home. This fantasy
clouds McCain's judgment on foreign policy......most of the other
high-profile politicians who fought in Vietnam -- Colin Powell, Chuck
Hegel, John Kerry, and Jim Webb -- aren't stuck in the past, and they
don't view the Iraq War as a chance to get Vietnam right.
No principles
After years of honing a reputation as a guy who'll say the truth
regardless of the political consequences, McCain has crashed the
Straight Talk Express. On almost every issue where he took a principled
stand against the Republican line -- taxes, immigration, oil drilling,
the Religious Right -- he's changed his views..we ought to like
politicians who change their mind when the facts change; it shows
maturity, judgment and flexibility. But politicians who change their
mind to suit the prevailing winds show the opposite.
The bottom line
Successful presidents come from two molds: visionaries, or mechanics.
The visionaries -- think Reagan or FDR -- see what others can't and say
'Why not?" to inspire the country. The mechanics -- think LBJ or
Eisenhower -- know the ins and outs of government and are able to
harness the power of millions of humans to accomplish great things, or
at least keep the wheels from coming off....McCain fits neither
style. He's neither a dreamer, nor a detail guy........his major
accomplishment, in Vietnam and in the Senate, has been merely to
survive.
Just surviving doesn't
make you're a hero, or a decent president. America needs to do more
than survive the next four years. "
Posted by: renko at 11:49AM EST on August 13, 2008
It sickens me to
think that Zoe Baird and Kimba Wood were disqualified as choices for
Attorney General because of nanny taxes.........and yet we get Attorneys
General who:
*believe in trashing the Constitution (Ashcroft);
*approve of voter suppression and torture, as well as lie to Congress and
reporters (Gonzales);
But this isn’t just to point out that the current Attorney General is
willing to say that not every crime is a crime in trying to stretch the
boundaries of reality so far as to not prosecute...um....hmmm....what’s
the word....oh yeah....crimes by members of his own Justice Department, it is to wonder just what other crimes,
I mean “violations of the law” are just peachy keen according to the
man who only holds the title and position of the nation’s top law
enforcement official.
For good measure, covering for the President himself over potential crimes, er, “violations of law” that the President may have committed is most certainly not a crime.
"Russian tanks roared deep into Georgia(n territory)
on Monday, launching a new western front in the conflict, and Russian
planes staged air raids that sent people screaming and fleeing for
cover in some towns.
The escalating warfare brought sharp words from President Bush, who pressed Moscow
to accept an immediate cease-fire and pull its troops out to avert a
"dramatic and brutal escalation" of violence in the former Soviet republic.
"I've expressed my grave concern about the disproportionate response of
Russia and that we strongly condemn the bombing outside of South
Ossetia," Bush told NBC Sports. Putin criticized the United States for viewing Georgia as the
victim instead of the aggressor, and for airlifting Georgian troops
back home from Iraq on Sunday.
"Of course, Saddam Hussein ought to have been hanged for destroying several Shiite villages," Putin said in Moscow.
"And the incumbent Georgian leaders who razed ten Ossetian villages at
once, who ran elderly people and children with tanks, who burned
civilian alive in their sheds — these leaders must be taken under
protection."
Pentagon officials said...(the) U.S. military was assessing
the fighting every day to determine whether to pull the fewer than 100
remaining American trainers out of the country."
"As
a Russian jet bombed fields around his village, Djimali Avago, a
Georgian farmer, asked me: “Why won’t America and Nato help us? If they
won’t help us now, why did we help them in Iraq?”
If this is true, whoever is responsible should be banned from foreign policy for the rest of his or her natural life:
"Mr Saakashvilli may also have banked on support from
his closest ally, US president George W Bush, whose administration is
said to have given tacit support for a Georgian assault on South
Ossetia in the believe that the territory could be recaptured within 48
hours."
"Bush pressed the other NATO powers to place Georgia's application for
membership on the fast track. The Europeans rejected the idea,
understanding the geo-strategic implications of pushing NATO's
boundaries right up to Russia's border. If the Europeans had let Bush
have his way, we would now be obligated by treaty to send troops in
Georgia's defense. That is to say, we would now be in a shooting war
with the Russians. Those who might oppose entering such a war would be
accused of "weakening our credibility" and "destroying the unity of the
Western alliance."
(The same question can be asked of the Bush administration. Vice President Dick Cheney
reportedly called Saakashvili on Sunday to assure him that "Russian
aggression must not go unanswered." We should all be interested to know
what answer he is preparing or whether he was just dangling the
Georgians on another few inches of string.)"
http://www.slate.com/id/2197281/
However, "I am not saying it's all our fault. Russia and Georgia are independent
actors, and their leaders are responsible for their decisions. But we
are also responsible for ours, and if we knowingly encouraged, or even
green-lighted, Saakashvili's actions, that is a piece of
idiocy on a par with (Bush1's) encouraging the Iraqi Shi'a to revolt after the
Gulf War. We should not create expectations we are not prepared to meet."
---McCain also contributed towards this Georgian mindset with his calling for them to be admitted to NATO. He's now saying this would have deterred the Russians from counter-attacking, after the Georgians invaded S. Ossetia.